about ipas
newsroom
what we do
where we work
products
publications
contact


“Two days ago, in obstetrics triage, I had a Hispanic, non-documented patient with no financial support, [a miscarriage] and no resources, desperate for help. I felt so lucky to be able to use my manual vacuum aspirator (a medical instrument used for treating miscarriages) since the operating room (OR) and labor and delivery were booming, and we could not utilize the OR even if we wanted to. It worked great, and I got to train one of the other second-year residents on it. It’s great. The patient was so appreciative, and her family was so grateful. She almost had no pain. When I told her we were done, she could not believe it.”

— Third-year obstetrics-gynecology r esident in a Texas hospital


Ipas's U.S. Program works to increase access to safe abortion care — including first-trimester abortion and miscarriage management — for women throughout the country, and advocates for policies that protect and advance women’s right to determine their reproductive futures.

Accessing high quality reproductive health care in the United States, a resource-rich country with one of the world’s most advanced medical systems, is not always possible for some women, particularly marginalized and economically disadvantaged women. This is due to many complex reasons, including the increasingly restrictive political environment that threatens access to abortion services; a decline in the number of hospitals, clinics and private health-care providers offering abortion services; limited public funding for abortion services for low-income women; and a shrinking number of individual health-care providers who are skilled in safe abortion care.

Since 2000, U.S. legislators have proposed more than 300 bills related to limiting women’s access to abortion. Directly threatening women’s health, state legislatures have limited abortion access by reducing public funding for abortions for low-income women, mandating parental consent or notification for minors seeking abortions, and requiring waiting periods for women of all ages before undergoing an abortion. At a time when many countries worldwide are loosening restrictions on abortion, abortion access is becoming more restricted in the United States, where the number of abortion providers fell by almost 40 percent between 1982 and 2001.

In some states, women are forced to cross state lines or travel far distances for an abortion because there are no local providers. In a country that has one of the highest rates of adolescent pregnancy in the world, where half of all women’s pregnancies are unplanned, and where about half of all unintended pregnancies end in abortion, access to high-quality, safe abortion care is critical.

Where access to safe abortion is not easily available and where women lack knowledge about their reproductive choices, some women are resorting to self-induced abortion in the United States. In May 2005, a Latina in South Carolina was jailed for four months after a self-induced abortion using unprescribed misoprostol, a drug used to treat gastric ulcers, that she had obtained from a relative in Mexico. In early 2007, another Latina, this time in Massachusetts, faced a possible homicide charge after self-inducing an abortion with misoprostol pills she obtained from a friend.

The Ipas U.S. Program has two major initiatives:

Additionally, Ipas partners with U.S. reproductive rights groups and other key organizations to educate opinion leaders about the reproductive health issues confronting U.S. women and to advocate for change to ensure safe and high-quality abortion-care practices. Because Ipas has extensive global expertise in reproductive health and rights, we also disseminate information on how U.S. anti-choice policies impact human rights and the ability to access reproductive health-care services worldwide.

  • Ballou, Brian R. and Raja Mishra. 25 January 2007. “Alleged bid to abort leads to baby’s death.” Boston Globe.
  • Henshaw, Stanley K. and Lawrence B. Finer. 2003. “The accessibility of abortion services in the United States, 2001.” Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 35(1):16-24. Available online, last accessed 26 December 2006.
  • Kaiser Daily Women’s Health Policy Report. 3 May 2005. “Mexican immigrant could face two years in prison for self-induced abortion under South Carolina law.” Synopsis of article by Rick Brundrett in The (Columbia S.C.) State. Available online, last accessed 28 August 2007.
  • Presler, Lindsay Bessick, Robyn Schryer Fehrman, Rivka Gordon and Katherine Turner. 2006. Mentoring for service-delivery change: A trainer’s handbook. Chapel Hill, NC, Ipas.